- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 11:28:19 -0400
- To: Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>
- CC: Frank Olivier <Frank.Olivier@microsoft.com>, "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On 08/02/2012 12:59 PM, Richard Schwerdtfeger wrote: [snip] > > */For these reasons I would ask that the chairs move issue 131 to > HTML.next and save proposal > /*http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/CaretSelectionRevised*/ for > review at that time. This will give more time for canvas, > contenteditable, web-based IME support, and cross-cutting accessibility > support to develop and mature. If the chairs agree to then I would > support the chairs decision for HTML5 as a temporary one requiring > greater view in the next version, otherwise I will need to formally > object to the chairs decision. Richard, You are certainly welcome do one or more of the following: a) Withdraw or modify your CaretSelectionRevised proposal from/for consideration for HTML5. b) Work with Frank and others to see if they will withdraw or modify their proposal c) Submit an alternate proposal indicating that the spec should remain as is and that the Reading_text_in_canvas proposal should be deferred to HTML.next d) Submit a Formal Objection Meanwhile, these parallel options are available to all working group members. In particular, until or unless the Reading_text_in_canvas proposal is withdrawn, it is still eligible for consideration. Therefore, we encourage you to first work with Frank and others. Should that not satisfy you, the way to ask the chairs to move issue 131 to HTML.next is to withdraw CaretSelectionRevised, and write up a Change Proposal to defer the feature. If it helps, you can base your proposal off of Ted's proposal for issue 195[1]. If you do so, and Reading_text_in_canvas is not withdrawn, we will proceed to a survey and all WG members will be given an opportunity to state their objections to each of the available proposals there. And a decision will be produced based on the objections expressed there. None of the actions described above would prevent you from submitting CaretSelectionRevised for consideration for HTML.next, or for submitting a Formal Objection to the decision on Issue 205. - Sam Ruby [1] http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/User:Eoconnor/ISSUE-195
Received on Friday, 3 August 2012 15:28:50 UTC