Re: Change Proposal for ISSUE-177, was: ISSUE-177 ietf-id-wip: Chairs Solicit Proposals

On 2011-10-09 23:23, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Sun, 09 Oct 2011 15:59:10 +0200, Julian Reschke
> <> wrote:
>> In addition to the simple fact described above, marking drafts as such
>> will help reviewers better understand that the referenced document is
>> work-in-progress, helping preventing things from progressing on the
>> Rec track while having a normative reference to a document that's not
>> suited as normative reference. See <>.
> Given that it is cited as work in progress there how did it help for
> that document?

That's a good point. Apparently it did not. Maybe it will in other cases.

Best regards, Julian

Received on Sunday, 9 October 2011 21:57:16 UTC