- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2011 23:56:42 +0200
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- CC: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, HTML WG LIST <public-html@w3.org>
On 2011-10-09 23:23, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Sun, 09 Oct 2011 15:59:10 +0200, Julian Reschke > <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: >> RATIONALE >> >> In addition to the simple fact described above, marking drafts as such >> will help reviewers better understand that the referenced document is >> work-in-progress, helping preventing things from progressing on the >> Rec track while having a normative reference to a document that's not >> suited as normative reference. See <http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets/#sniff>. > > Given that it is cited as work in progress there how did it help for > that document? That's a good point. Apparently it did not. Maybe it will in other cases. Best regards, Julian
Received on Sunday, 9 October 2011 21:57:16 UTC