W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > October 2011

Re: Change Proposal for ISSUE-177, was: ISSUE-177 ietf-id-wip: Chairs Solicit Proposals

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2011 23:23:29 +0200
To: "Sam Ruby" <rubys@intertwingly.net>, "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: "HTML WG LIST" <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.v23sdflx64w2qv@cm->
On Sun, 09 Oct 2011 15:59:10 +0200, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>  
> In addition to the simple fact described above, marking drafts as such  
> will help reviewers better understand that the referenced document is  
> work-in-progress, helping preventing things from progressing on the Rec  
> track while having a normative reference to a document that's not suited  
> as normative reference. See <http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets/#sniff>.

Given that it is cited as work in progress there how did it help for that  

Anne van Kesteren
Received on Sunday, 9 October 2011 21:24:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:45:44 UTC