- From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 18:45:04 +1100
- To: Dean Leigh <dean.leigh@deanleigh.co.uk>
- Cc: public-html@w3.org
Not possible - it already exists: http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/text-level-semantics.html#the-sub-and-sup-elements Cheers, Silvia. On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Dean Leigh <dean.leigh@deanleigh.co.uk> wrote: > I think the naming of this element as <hsub> indicates and therefore restricts its use to only being a sub Sub-Heading. > Whereas <subline> may in future be used as 'sub' to other elements e.g. <caption>, <figcaption>. > > Therefore I would like to propose that the element be further simplified to <sub>. > > - This addresses the semantic issues as it is a <sub> of its preceding tag > - It can be ignored in outlines > - It can be styled easily with > > > We can then which focus discussion on which tags are eligible for <sub>. > > Regards, > Dean Leigh > > >>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: Simon Pieters [mailto:simonp@opera.com] >>>Sent: 07 November 2011 06:40 >>>To: public-html@w3.org; Kornel Lesiński >>>Subject: Re: Change Proposal to replace hgroup with a simple element >>> >>>On Mon, 07 Nov 2011 00:38:32 +0100, Kornel Lesiński >>><kornel@geekhood.net> >>>wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> I agree with Lars Gunther that reuse of <h1-h6> for subheadings causes >>>> nothing but trouble, and subheadings can be marked up in a more >>>> straightforward manner. >>>> >>>> I'd like to propose a new element that IMHO is much easier to understand >>>> and use correctly, satisfies all major use cases of <hgroup> and does >>>> not break outline in legacy UAs. >>>> >>>> The proposal is in the wiki: >>>> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/hSub >>>> >>>> ---- >>>> >>>> Change Proposal >>>> >>>> Replace <hgroup> with an element that has a simple content model and >>>> backwards compatibility. >>>> >>>> Rationale >>>> >>>> * <hgroup> overloads meaning of <h1-h6>, making them either >>>> headings included in document >>>> outline or not, depending on context created by hgroup and other >>>> headings. No other >>>> element in HTML creates such ambiguous context-dependent >>>meaning. >>>> >>>> * Name and usage of <hgroup> can be confused with <header>, since >>>> both appear in headers >>>> and group elements. >>>> >>>> * <hgroup>'s content model disallows adding extra <div>s around >>>> multiple subheadings, which >>>> may be needed as styling hooks. >>>> >>>> * Existing content on the web does not use as complex multi-level >>>> subheadings as <hgroup> >>>> was intended to support. There is no need to precisely mark up >>>> levels of subheadings, as >>>> the whole title is meant to be read in (document) order and >>>> subheadings are not used for >>>> sectioning/navigation. >>>> >>>> Details >>>> >>>> <hsub> element is a subheading. It represents a subheading for its >>>> section (i.e. it is >>>> associated with the heading in the same section that the <hsub> is >>>> in). The algorithm for >>>> associating <hsub> with a section is the same as for <h1-h6>, except >>>> <hsub> does not imply >>>> new sections. >>> >>>So basically it's associated with a section in the same way as <p>. >>> >>>> <hsub> element has same content model as <h1-h6>. >>>> >>>> Optionally: <hsub> can be allowed to be nested inside <h1-h6>, which >>>> allows full title to be >>>> seen as a header in legacy UAs and makes it easy to style heading >>>> and subheading using CSS. >>>> >>>> Examples >>>> >>>> <body> >>>> <h1>Title</h1> >>>> <hsub>Subtitle</hsub> >>>> >>>> <h1>Second Title</h1> >>>> <div> >>>> <hsub>Second Subtitle 1</hsub> >>>> <hsub>Second Subtitle 2</hsub> >>>> </div> >>>> </body> >>>> >>>> <article> >>>> <hsub>The Magical</hsub> >>>> <h1>Title</h1> >>>> <hsub>That Has</hsub> >>>> <hsub>Multiple Subtitles</hsub> >>>> </article> >>>> >>>> Styling >>>> >>>> The most common usage of subheadings can be styled simply with h1 + >>>> hsub CSS selector. >>>> Authors can make complex headers easier to select by wrapping >>>> headings and subheadings in >>>> <header>. Relaxed content model allows "styling hook" elements to be >>>> added as necessary. >>>> >>>> Authoring errors >>>> >>>> Mistakes in usage of <hsub> cannot break document outline, which is >>>> a significant improvement >>>> over <hgroup>. >>>> >>>> At worst, in a rather rare case of subtitle preceeding the title, >>>> subtitle may end up >>>> associated with an earlier heading: >>>> >>>> <h1>Unrelated title</h1> >>>> <p>Content</p> >>>> >>>> <hsub>Preceeding subtitle</hsub> >>>> <h1>Title</h1> >>>> >>>> However, this kind of mistake can be easily eliminated by use of >>>> <section>/<acticle> >>>> elements: >>>> >>>> <section> >>>> <hsub>Preceeding subtitle</hsub> >>>> <h1>Title</h1> >>>> </section> >>>> >>>> Risks >>>> >>>> Removal of the <hgroup> element. >>>> >>> >>>FWIW, I think this proposal is better than the <p>-in-<header> proposal >>>(which changes meaning of <p> based on placement) and the <subline> >>>proposal (which allows <h2> in <subline> so still breaks the outline in >>>legacy impl). >>> >>>My only concern with this proposal is whether <hsub> should be allowed >>>"anywhere" or if it should be restricted in some way (e.g. require a >>>heading in its section, don't allow it in implied sections unless it is >>>follows the heading element directly). >>> >>>-- >>>Simon Pieters >>>Opera Software > >
Received on Monday, 7 November 2011 07:46:02 UTC