- From: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 20:39:10 +0000
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- CC: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
>My substantive comment is that I feel like I either need an option that says: > ( ) I can live with this option as long as the specification > continues to be published at whatwg.org under a more liberal > license; otherwise I cannot live with this license. >or clearer instructions on whether responders should assume that simultaneous publication at the WHATWG will continue. I believe the current survey (with radio buttons for each choice) would permit you to select your response for a license and then to provide any caveats in the Rationale field. Does that meet your needs? Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3 Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329
Received on Monday, 25 April 2011 20:39:40 UTC