- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 15:53:35 -0700
- To: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
- Cc: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
On Monday 2011-04-25 20:39 +0000, Paul Cotton wrote: > >My substantive comment is that I feel like I either need an option that says: > > ( ) I can live with this option as long as the specification > > continues to be published at whatwg.org under a more liberal > > license; otherwise I cannot live with this license. > >or clearer instructions on whether responders should assume that simultaneous publication at the WHATWG will continue. > > I believe the current survey (with radio buttons for each choice) > would permit you to select your response for a license and then to > provide any caveats in the Rationale field. Does that meet your > needs? It does if it's clear which set of assumptions the survey is assuming, that is, whether I should assume continued whatwg publication when choosing the radio buttons and explain in the comments how I'd respond given the lack of continued whatwg publication, or the other way around. -David -- L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ Mozilla Corporation http://www.mozilla.com/
Received on Monday, 25 April 2011 22:54:03 UTC