- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 14:42:13 -0700
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Cc: public-html@w3.org
On Friday 2011-04-22 17:26 -0400, Sam Ruby wrote: > On 04/22/2011 05:08 PM, Edward O'Connor wrote: > >Hi, > > > >Paul Cotton wrote: > > > >>The Chairs have drafted a survey on the three licensing options which > >>is available for review at [2]. > >[…] > >>[2] http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/html5-license-poll/ > > > >I suspect only the chairs can see the content at this link; all I see > >is: "This questionnaire is not yet open. It will open on 2012-04-28. > >Inform your Team contact if you think it should already be open." > > Sorry about that. Here is a snapshot: > > http://intertwingly.net/tmp/html5-license-poll.html I'm guessing the intent is to use a set of radio buttons for each license; there are currently radio buttons for option 1 and checkboxes for options 2 and 3. My substantive comment is that I feel like I either need an option that says: ( ) I can live with this option as long as the specification continues to be published at whatwg.org under a more liberal license; otherwise I cannot live with this license. or clearer instructions on whether responders should assume that simultaneous publication at the WHATWG will continue. -David -- L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ Mozilla Corporation http://www.mozilla.com/
Received on Friday, 22 April 2011 21:42:44 UTC