- From: Masataka Yakura <myakura.web@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2011 18:00:45 +0900
- To: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Cc: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> wrote: > what are the arguments for/against adding a role value to indicate when a > h1-h6 is acting as a subheading? > > <h1>heading</h1> > <h2 role=subheading> subtitle </h2> > > - removes need for hgroup Does that suggest removing hgroup from HTML5 spec or keeping it but discourage the use of it? Given that: major browsers now recognize hgroup in parsing and styling level [1][2][3][4][5]; some people have already start using it; and there are lots of books on HTML5 markup talking about using hgroup along with sectioning elements, so I don't really want hgroup to be removed from the spec... I don't have a strong opinion about adding a role value, though. [1] http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-US/ie/ff468705.aspx#_HTML5_Semantic_Elements [2] http://www.apple.com/safari/features.html#technologies [3] http://www.opera.com/docs/specs/presto27/html5/ [4] https://developer.mozilla.org/en/HTML/Element/hgroup [5] http://chrome.blogspot.com/2010/10/bringing-another-chrome-release-to-you.html Regards, -- Masataka Yakura <myakura.web@gmail.com>
Received on Friday, 8 April 2011 09:01:32 UTC