- From: Masataka Yakura <myakura.web@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 20:55:50 +0900
- To: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- Cc: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Michael Smith <mike@w3.org>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 8:19 AM, Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no> wrote: > How could I have known? It is impossible to spot "_vendor-feature" in > the Commit-Watchers mailing list - though it probably exist there > somewhere (?). (While "vendor--feature" was easy to find.) However bug > 9590 hints that _vendor-feature dates back to just before April 25th. > At any rate, _vendor-feature first time appeared in the current > published Working Draft, of 24th of June. [3] A search in public-html > for _vendor does not reveal anything either. Discussion in the whatwg > list seems to be not more than a moth old. FYI, the bug for introducing vendor-specific extension was raised on the 13th of March [1], and the attribute introduced on the 1st of April [2]. [1] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9239 [2] http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=4938&to=4939 -- Masataka Yakura <myakura.web@gmail.com>
Received on Friday, 24 September 2010 12:24:56 UTC