W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > September 2010

Re: ISSUE-41: Decentralized-extensibility - Straw Poll for Objections

From: Masataka Yakura <myakura.web@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 20:55:50 +0900
Message-ID: <AANLkTimRXSQ4+Kg8StB5MPp0ajW5VX73jiWwkVfHw6fY@mail.gmail.com>
To: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Cc: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Michael Smith <mike@w3.org>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 8:19 AM, Leif Halvard Silli
<xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no> wrote:
> How could I have known?  It is impossible to spot "_vendor-feature" in
> the Commit-Watchers mailing list - though it probably exist there
> somewhere (?). (While "vendor--feature" was easy to find.) However bug
> 9590 hints that _vendor-feature dates back to just before April 25th.
> At any rate, _vendor-feature first time appeared in the current
> published Working Draft, of 24th of June. [3] A search in public-html
> for _vendor does not reveal anything either. Discussion in the whatwg
> list seems to be not more than a moth old.

FYI, the bug for introducing vendor-specific extension was raised on
the 13th of March [1], and the attribute introduced on the 1st of
April [2].

[1] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9239
[2] http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=4938&to=4939

Masataka Yakura
Received on Friday, 24 September 2010 12:24:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:16:05 UTC