Re: Bug mail (Was: [Bug 10479] add role=radiogroup to details element)

On 09/13/2010 03:45 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Sam Ruby<>  wrote:
>> On 09/13/2010 03:07 AM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
>>> On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 08:24:39 +0200, Jonas Sicking<>
>>> wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:49 PM, Henri Sivonen<>  wrote:
>>>>>> Would it be possible for the accessibility task force to track bugs
>>>>>> using the status whiteboard instead of using a keyword.
>>>>> Or, better yet, continue to use keywords but make the email path not
>>>>> spam public-html for keyword changes. Or for any bug modifications
>>>>> after the bug creation for that matter.
>>>> I always liked the fact that the group got email when the NE keyword
>>>> was added.
>> +1
>> I want every member of this list to be aware of -- at a minimum -- the
>> subject of every non-editorial bug.  Ultimately, I expect the change control
>> as we move to LC and beyond to be that at some point the only changes made
>> to the document are in response to bugs reported.
> Note that the NE keyword hasn't been 100% successful in this task. I
> believe a lot of the filed bugs are currently lacking it.

While anything involving humans is bound to have bugs, Mike has been 
dilligent so that I don't think that there is any systematic problems here.

> Though I
> can't really blame people because sometimes it's hard to tell if an
> issue just needs to be clarified, or if behavior needs to be changed.
> I think it would be much more effective to have the initial bugmail to
> to the list whenever a bug is filed.

I've seen a lot of asdflkasd;jads bugs as a result of the bug form.  If 
people are complaining now...

- Sam Ruby

Received on Monday, 13 September 2010 20:04:08 UTC