Re: Bug mail (Was: [Bug 10479] add role=radiogroup to details element)

On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote:
> On 09/13/2010 03:07 AM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 08:24:39 +0200, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:49 PM, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Would it be possible for the accessibility task force to track bugs
>>>>> using the status whiteboard instead of using a keyword.
>>>>
>>>> Or, better yet, continue to use keywords but make the email path not
>>>> spam public-html for keyword changes. Or for any bug modifications
>>>> after the bug creation for that matter.
>>>
>>> I always liked the fact that the group got email when the NE keyword
>>> was added.
>
> +1
>
> I want every member of this list to be aware of -- at a minimum -- the
> subject of every non-editorial bug.  Ultimately, I expect the change control
> as we move to LC and beyond to be that at some point the only changes made
> to the document are in response to bugs reported.

Note that the NE keyword hasn't been 100% successful in this task. I
believe a lot of the filed bugs are currently lacking it. Though I
can't really blame people because sometimes it's hard to tell if an
issue just needs to be clarified, or if behavior needs to be changed.
I think it would be much more effective to have the initial bugmail to
to the list whenever a bug is filed.

>From a bugzilla point of view, I think this can be accomplished by
making public-html be the default QA, and check the "I'm added to or
removed from this capacity" for QA Contact for the public-html
account. It might also work to do the same with the CC field.

/ Jonas

Received on Monday, 13 September 2010 19:45:58 UTC