- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 12:45:07 -0700
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Cc: Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>, public-html@w3.org
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote: > On 09/13/2010 03:07 AM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote: >> >> On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 08:24:39 +0200, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> >> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:49 PM, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Would it be possible for the accessibility task force to track bugs >>>>> using the status whiteboard instead of using a keyword. >>>> >>>> Or, better yet, continue to use keywords but make the email path not >>>> spam public-html for keyword changes. Or for any bug modifications >>>> after the bug creation for that matter. >>> >>> I always liked the fact that the group got email when the NE keyword >>> was added. > > +1 > > I want every member of this list to be aware of -- at a minimum -- the > subject of every non-editorial bug. Ultimately, I expect the change control > as we move to LC and beyond to be that at some point the only changes made > to the document are in response to bugs reported. Note that the NE keyword hasn't been 100% successful in this task. I believe a lot of the filed bugs are currently lacking it. Though I can't really blame people because sometimes it's hard to tell if an issue just needs to be clarified, or if behavior needs to be changed. I think it would be much more effective to have the initial bugmail to to the list whenever a bug is filed. >From a bugzilla point of view, I think this can be accomplished by making public-html be the default QA, and check the "I'm added to or removed from this capacity" for QA Contact for the public-html account. It might also work to do the same with the CC field. / Jonas
Received on Monday, 13 September 2010 19:45:58 UTC