- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 15:06:30 -0400
- To: Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>
- CC: public-html@w3.org
On 09/13/2010 03:07 AM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote: > On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 08:24:39 +0200, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote: > >> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:49 PM, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi> wrote: >>>> Would it be possible for the accessibility task force to track bugs >>>> using the status whiteboard instead of using a keyword. >>> >>> Or, better yet, continue to use keywords but make the email path not >>> spam public-html for keyword changes. Or for any bug modifications >>> after the bug creation for that matter. >> >> I always liked the fact that the group got email when the NE keyword >> was added. +1 I want every member of this list to be aware of -- at a minimum -- the subject of every non-editorial bug. Ultimately, I expect the change control as we move to LC and beyond to be that at some point the only changes made to the document are in response to bugs reported. - Sam Ruby
Received on Monday, 13 September 2010 19:07:08 UTC