- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 21:28:09 +0200
- To: "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>, "Sam Ruby" <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Cc: "Steven Faulkner" <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
On Tue, 07 Sep 2010 21:06:15 +0200, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote: > We have a change proposal to provide reference and info about HTML5: > Techniques for providing useful text alternatives in html5 spec: > > http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/116 > > Since that time, we have agreement (see message below) that the existing > mechanism for identifying open issues in the document, coupled with > removal of the "last call for comments" status would resolve this issue. > Accordingly, the chairs are issuing a call for consensus at this time. > If there are no objections, we will adopt this change proposal on > September 15, 2010. So the proposal is to not add a reference (at this time), but do remove the "last call for comments" status markers? Seems fine to me. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Tuesday, 7 September 2010 19:28:47 UTC