- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 15:33:30 -0400
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- CC: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>, Steven Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
On 09/07/2010 03:28 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Tue, 07 Sep 2010 21:06:15 +0200, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> > wrote: >> We have a change proposal to provide reference and info about HTML5: >> Techniques for providing useful text alternatives in html5 spec: >> >> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/116 >> >> Since that time, we have agreement (see message below) that the >> existing mechanism for identifying open issues in the document, >> coupled with removal of the "last call for comments" status would >> resolve this issue. Accordingly, the chairs are issuing a call for >> consensus at this time. If there are no objections, we will adopt this >> change proposal on September 15, 2010. > > So the proposal is to not add a reference (at this time), but do remove > the "last call for comments" status markers? Correct. - Sam Ruby
Received on Tuesday, 7 September 2010 19:34:02 UTC