RE: requesting one more extension

The Chairs are considering your extension request.

But in the interim,  could you please let us know how early you could provide your change proposal for ISSUE-93:
http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/93 

As noted in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2010Feb/0385.html your proposal to eliminate <details> may be in direct conflict with Cynthia's proposal on <summary> for ISSUE-32:
http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/32 

/paulc

Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3
Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329


-----Original Message-----
From: public-html-request@w3.org [mailto:public-html-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Shelley Powers
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 11:19 AM
To: public-html@w3.org WG
Subject: requesting one more extension

My apologies to the group and the co-chairs:

I would like one more extension on the time for the change proposals for 
issues 89, 90, 91, 92, and 98. I'd like to complete these at the same 
time as I complete the others, on March 31st. I know the group would 
prefer not having items handled as a lump, but some of the arguments for 
some of the items, apply to the others, and I can't help thinking it 
might actually be beneficial to get all of them finished at once. This 
has worked in the past for specification edits, and can't help thinking 
it could also work for change proposals and issues.

Plus, I'm really pushing against my book deadline, and am concerned now 
I'll miss it -- something that's not helped by me getting sick.

I also volunteer, before you even ask the group, to write a change 
proposal for ISSUE-100, which could also apply to issue 103. I'd finish 
it at the same time, March 31. In fact, I'm going to try to have all my 
concerns written in change proposal format by March 31, even if the text 
is entered into a bug rather than written as part of a change proposal. 
I figured if it does become an issue and change proposal, the work is 
done ahead of time.

I appreciate the group and the co-chairs consideration of this request.

Shelley

Received on Thursday, 18 February 2010 19:04:22 UTC