- From: Shelley Powers <shelleypowers@burningbird.net>
- Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 13:13:25 -0600
- To: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
- CC: "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>, Cynthia Shelly <cyns@microsoft.com>
My change proposal for Issue 93 is due March 31st. Has Cynthia's proposal been put forth as a formal change proposal for Issue 32? The reason I ask, is that I'll incorporate a counter-proposal to the Issue 32 proposal, in conjunction with my Issue 93 change proposal. And I suppose the counter is true -- Cynthia's proposal will be counter to mine, to remove Details altogether from the spec. Regardless, the Issue 93 proposal is one I can't do early, I have technical proofs I need to create for this one, and they will take time. Shelley Paul Cotton wrote: > The Chairs are considering your extension request. > > But in the interim, could you please let us know how early you could provide your change proposal for ISSUE-93: > http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/93 > > As noted in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2010Feb/0385.html your proposal to eliminate <details> may be in direct conflict with Cynthia's proposal on <summary> for ISSUE-32: > http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/32 > > /paulc > > Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada > 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3 > Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329 > > > -----Original Message----- > From: public-html-request@w3.org [mailto:public-html-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Shelley Powers > Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 11:19 AM > To: public-html@w3.org WG > Subject: requesting one more extension > > My apologies to the group and the co-chairs: > > I would like one more extension on the time for the change proposals for > issues 89, 90, 91, 92, and 98. I'd like to complete these at the same > time as I complete the others, on March 31st. I know the group would > prefer not having items handled as a lump, but some of the arguments for > some of the items, apply to the others, and I can't help thinking it > might actually be beneficial to get all of them finished at once. This > has worked in the past for specification edits, and can't help thinking > it could also work for change proposals and issues. > > Plus, I'm really pushing against my book deadline, and am concerned now > I'll miss it -- something that's not helped by me getting sick. > > I also volunteer, before you even ask the group, to write a change > proposal for ISSUE-100, which could also apply to issue 103. I'd finish > it at the same time, March 31. In fact, I'm going to try to have all my > concerns written in change proposal format by March 31, even if the text > is entered into a bug rather than written as part of a change proposal. > I figured if it does become an issue and change proposal, the work is > done ahead of time. > > I appreciate the group and the co-chairs consideration of this request. > > Shelley > > > > > > >
Received on Thursday, 18 February 2010 19:14:03 UTC