Re: aftermath on Bug 8953 – URL decomp. IDL attributes when parsing fails

On 18.02.2010 19:16, Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Feb 2010, Julian Reschke wrote:
>>
>> Anyway, can we get back to the discussion *why* there is this
>> restriction to the syntax (considering it's not implemented, and all
>> kinds of other garbage are allowed)?
>
> Isn't that now out of scope for this working group? I thought the parsing
> of URLs was now an IRI matter.

For now it's not, until you change the spec's reference.

That being said -- what do you *want* IRIbis to define here? As the UAs 
do not implement what you specified I'm wondering what the rational for 
this special case could be.

Best regards, Julian

Received on Thursday, 18 February 2010 18:54:02 UTC