Re: aftermath on Bug 8953 – URL decomp. IDL attributes when parsing fails

On Thu, 18 Feb 2010, Julian Reschke wrote:
> Anyway, can we get back to the discussion *why* there is this 
> restriction to the syntax (considering it's not implemented, and all 
> kinds of other garbage are allowed)?

Isn't that now out of scope for this working group? I thought the parsing 
of URLs was now an IRI matter.

Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Received on Thursday, 18 February 2010 18:16:33 UTC