- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 09:38:41 +0100
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- CC: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu>, Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>, Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>, public-html@w3.org
Anne van Kesteren wrote: > ... >> Somebody once said: "the optimal number of optional features in a spec >> is zero", and "you're done with a spec when there's nothing left to >> remove" (maybe it way Yaron G.). >> >> Of course that doesn't always work well, but there's a lot of truth in >> it. But: if we're really concerned with the size of the spec than >> there are far bigger parts that could be removed. > > I think the concern is more about the size of the platform. I.e. > splitting a feature into its own specification does not really qualify. > ... Both are concerns. BR, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 28 October 2009 08:39:38 UTC