Re: Issue-72: Microdata/RDFa: Chairs Solicit *COUNTER* proposals

On Mon, 26 Oct 2009, Sam Ruby wrote:
> Current status is that we have a Working Group draft that contains 
> Microdata in the HTML5 specification, and a Change Proposal to split 
> Microdata out into a separate document:
> The current draft was produced before we instituted the current process 
> requiring rationale in commit messages, so if there are anybody who 
> prefers the draft as it is (or even wants to make a different Change 
> Proposal), what we need is a Change Proposal (possibly with "zero edits" 
> as the Proposal Details), but with similar level of detail in the other 
> sections to what Manu produced.
> If none is provided by December 2nd, we proceed with a Call for 
> Consensus on Manu's Change Proposal.

What happens if there's no other change proposal, but Manu's doesn't have 

Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Received on Tuesday, 27 October 2009 09:56:53 UTC