- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 23:59:49 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- Cc: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Sun, 25 Oct 2009, Simon Pieters wrote: > On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 03:58:20 +0300, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: > > > > This also made the conformance requirements for <script> quite > > complex. I ended up using ABNF, but I couldn't quite work out how to > > do it without prose rules. If anyone can rephrase the ABNF for > > <script> restrictions without using prose rules, please let me know. > > (Also acceptable: a version of the ABNF in unambiguous English prose. > > I didn't even try in this case because I think it would be > > inpenetrable.) > > It would be good to have similar (but less complex) content model > restrictions on the other (r)cdata elements in order to make > <style><!--</style> invalid because that causes weird parsing in legacy > browsers and is clearly an authoring mistake. What rule do you want? Just making "<!--" invalid? -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Monday, 26 October 2009 00:00:30 UTC