- From: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 14:13:57 +0200
- To: "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: "Henri Sivonen" <hsivonen@iki.fi>, "HTMLWG WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 03:58:20 +0300, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: > This also made the conformance requirements for <script> quite complex. I > ended up using ABNF, but I couldn't quite work out how to do it without > prose rules. If anyone can rephrase the ABNF for <script> restrictions > without using prose rules, please let me know. (Also acceptable: a > version > of the ABNF in unambiguous English prose. I didn't even try in this case > because I think it would be inpenetrable.) It would be good to have similar (but less complex) content model restrictions on the other (r)cdata elements in order to make <style><!--</style> invalid because that causes weird parsing in legacy browsers and is clearly an authoring mistake. -- Simon Pieters Opera Software
Received on Sunday, 25 October 2009 13:14:43 UTC