- From: Adrian Bateman <adrianba@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 03:43:15 +0000
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- CC: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Tuesday, October 20, 2009 9:33 PM, Ian Hickson wrote: > On Tue, 20 Oct 2009, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > > The other piece of information we would like in every resolved > > bugzilla bug is a link to the relevant revision of the spec. I've > > talked to Ian about this so far, not yet other editors. He is > > including the bugzilla bug number in every commit. Ian tells me that, > > given the way he edits the spec (with a long processing pipeline > > before the change is fully committed, and often multiple edits in > > flight), it is awkward to include a diff link in the bug at the time > > the bug is resolved. > > Actually since I started including the bug number in the commit, I just > just made the commit script post the diff to the bug. For example: > > http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7416#c2 > > Is that ok? Thanks Ian. This looks great and precisely addresses the concern I had. This makes it simple for bug reporters to review the changes that were made in the check-in that included the proposed resolution for their issue. Cheers, Adrian.
Received on Thursday, 22 October 2009 03:45:02 UTC