- From: Steven Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 12:12:56 +0200
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>, W3C WAI-XTECH <wai-xtech@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <55687cf80910210312se6701b8j57a04eb497b2910@mail.gmail.com>
Hi ian, > <snipping> the example stuff as the discussion is not about what > developers _should_ do, its about what developers _can_ and _do_. >Conformance is about what developers _should_ do, however. I agree, but developers are allowed to add behaviours and styles that turn a link into a button and they won't get nagged when they check the conformance of the code, but adding a role will result in a conformance error. Easy way to get rid of it is to remove the ARIA role, what results in a conforming, but less accessible ineterface control. seems like the goal conformance is wrong if this occurs. If the point of conformance is about what devlopers _should_ do then developers need to be told their code is non conforming regardless of the presence of ARIA. regards Stevef 2009/10/21 Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> > On Wed, 21 Oct 2009, Steven Faulkner wrote: > > > > <snipping> the example stuff as the discussion is not about what > > developers _should_ do, its about what developers _can_ and _do_. > > Conformance is about what developers _should_ do, however. > > -- > Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL > http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. > Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.' > -- with regards Steve Faulkner Technical Director - TPG Europe Director - Web Accessibility Tools Consortium www.paciellogroup.com | www.wat-c.org Web Accessibility Toolbar - http://www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html
Received on Wednesday, 21 October 2009 10:13:31 UTC