- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 11:55:30 -0500
- To: Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>
- Cc: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>, Olivier GENDRIN <olivier.gendrin@gmail.com>, Nicholas Stimpson <nicholas.stimpson@ntlworld.com>, public-html@w3.org
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com> wrote: > On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:11:14 +0200, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> >> This doesn't prevent you from expressing anything, as you can always >> just write all the referred-to ids directly in the @itemref attribute, >> but it might be annoying in some cases. If it's not a big deal, >> though, then it's probably not a problem to change. > > Indeed. Can anyone figure out a proper example that actually needs to chain > the references? A single @itemref attribute on the @itemscope'd element > isn't the only option (although the one I like best so far). I keep trying for examples, but every time I do it turns out that the middle element in the chain is really an @itemscope of its own, or can trivially become one (moving @itemprops around to make it so doesn't require significant rewriting). ~TJ
Received on Monday, 19 October 2009 16:56:24 UTC