- From: Shelley Powers <shelleyp@burningbird.net>
- Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 10:52:10 -0500
- To: public-html@w3.org
> On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Karl Dubost <karl@la-grange.net> wrote: > > > > Le 16 oct. 2009 à 11:40, Henri Sivonen a écrit : > >> > >> An example of my concern about RDFa is that in uses syntax that in > Gecko, > >> WebKit and Presto parses to a different DOM Level 2 representation in > >> text/html and application/xhtml+xml. I can assess whether a > proposal has > >> this property even if the proposal is solving a problem I wouldn't > >> personally pursue solving as a priority. This touches on my > activities as a > >> parser developer. > > > > Are there (or do you know) plans to actually implement into some of the > > browsers (only one class of products) either microdata, rdfa or > microformats > > in the core parsing engine? > > > > I know already some implementations of rdfa and microformats, but as > > external parser. > > I'm planning on getting microdata implemented in Firefox. We'd do this > by implementing the DOM APIs described in the spec, as well as > implement hooks so that it'd be easy to create Firefox extensions that > react to microdata formats. I'm assuming that you would do so if Microdata were separated out into its own document. Would that be a correct assumption? > > We already have an addon that adds microformats support to Firefox[1], > but I'm not quite sure what that support looks like. > > [1] https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/4106 > > / Jonas Shelley
Received on Sunday, 18 October 2009 15:52:50 UTC