- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 20:37:04 +0200
- To: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
- CC: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Message-ID: <4AD37750.9060904@gmx.de>
Manu Sporny wrote: > I volunteered for an action to produce a draft document that included > @profile in HTML5: > > http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/actions/144 > > The document attempts to address the long standing ISSUE-55: > > http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/55 > > After speaking with Julian over the weekend, we explored the possibility > that perhaps the document should focus on the concept of extending > processing behavior for user agents via @profile and @version. Perhaps > even stating that we'd like to move away from @profile (because it > hasn't been used as much as we'd like), toward something that is simpler > and has been used in both XHTML and RDFa: a specifically formatted > @version attribute. > ... It appears trying to do multiple things at once complicates things. Thus, may I suggest to divide this into smaller chunks we can develop, and hopefully find consensus on? For @profile the things to do include: 1) Agreeing on what HTML 4.01 should have said (acknowledging it's inconsistent, and thus contributes to the confusion) 2) Documenting @profile as conforming, either separately, or inside HTML5 (where I would prefer the latter) 3) Optionally find a better replacement for @profile, which *could* be link/@rel=profile. Note that deploying that will require updates to those specs that currently use @profile, such GRDDL or DC-HTML, so it will require a transition period in which @profile would stay conforming. Attached is a proposal for 1). I realize that we're not doing errata for HTML 4.01, but IMHO having this phrased this way will be helpful for steps 2) and 3). Best regards, Julian PS: thanks to Björn for proofreading
Attachments
- text/html attachment: profile-erratum.html
Received on Monday, 12 October 2009 18:38:40 UTC