Re: HTML Working Group Decision Policy - for discussion

On Thu, 8 Oct 2009, Sam Ruby wrote:
> 
> My hope remains that we settle on MIT.  If the W3C and WHATWG can't come 
> to an agreement on a license, then we will need to revisit this -- but 
> then again, we will need to revisit a lot of assumptions, so I would 
> recommend that we cross that bridge when we get to it.

I assume you mean "If the W3C and the HTMLWG participants can't come to an 
agreement...", not "W3C and WHATWG"; I'm unaware of any W3C/WHATWG 
communication on the subject. As far as I'm aware, it's only an internal 
HTMLWG issue regarding the licensing of the HTMLWG deliverables.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Received on Thursday, 8 October 2009 09:12:56 UTC