Re: ISSUE-1: pingpost - Chairs Solicit Proposals

Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> On Nov 19, 2009, at 9:06 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
>> Paul Cotton wrote:
>>>> ISSUE-1 (pingpost) Hyperlink auditing requires use of unsafe HTTP 
>>>> method
>>> This issue has been open for over a two years, and the only concrete 
>>> proposal we have at this point is in the draft.  At this time the 
>>> chairs would like to solicit volunteers to write Change Proposals for 
>>> this issue.
>>> ...
>> The non-concrete proposal always has been to remove that feature. If 
>> that's helpful, I can transform that into a more concrete one.
> A Change Proposal to remove the feature would be fine, if you think that 
> is the best way to address the issue. I believe it would cover this 
> issue as well as ISSUE-2. Can I put you down as a volunteer to write a 
> Change Proposal for these two issues?

I will consider writing this proposal unless somebody wants to do it 
earlier. However, I'd like no clock to be started unless I know when 
I'll be able to do it. So consider me a candidate for this, nothing more.

And yes, removing the feature would address ISSUE-2 as well. If the 
outcome of the WG decision will be to keep a/@ping, ISSUE-2 will still 
need to be considered separately.

Best regards, Julian

Received on Wednesday, 25 November 2009 08:53:34 UTC