- From: Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 12:13:24 -0600
- To: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- Cc: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, public-html <public-html@w3.org>
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 11:36 AM, Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk> wrote: > On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 07:59 -0600, Shelley Powers wrote: >> Even the reference to the navigator object is browser specific, not >> DOM specific. Though objects like window and navigator are considered >> "DOM Level 0", they're really not DOM, as we know the Document Object >> Model from previous and current implementations. They're part of the >> BOM, or Browser Object Model. Most particularly, discussions related >> to the BOM and JavaScript are not related to HTML. > > I completely agree that it's an issue for HTML5 to include > specifications for window and navigator objects. I've been advocating > splitting them out for at least a year. > > Yes, they're useful specifications to have, but they're NOT HTML. > > They could be split out into a separate specification or specifications, > and HTML5 would probably not even need to reference them. > I agree. Toby have you submitted bugs on this that are closed? I am submitting new bugs on this and other related issues next week and would like to reference your past efforts. > -- > Toby A Inkster > <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk> > <http://tobyinkster.co.uk> > > Shelley
Received on Thursday, 19 November 2009 18:13:57 UTC