- From: Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 12:45:58 -0500
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Julian Reschke<julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > Shelley Powers wrote: >> >> I followed the teleconference in IRC archives. A lot of stuff. >> >> Questions of clarification: >> >> Do we still have discussion when it comes to publishing a Working >> Draft, regardless of who publishes it? > > Yes. (There was discussion around this, but no conclusion). > Perhaps the chairs can provide a definitive answer on this? >> Do we need consensus, or are all Working Drafts being published, >> unless someone actively protests? > > No news on this. > >> If someone publishes a Working Draft with many differences, can we >> discuss each, or is it a case of all or nothing? > > Not discussed, as far as I recall. > Again, this could be a Chair decision. I suppose we could submit multiple WD, one for each issue. Bit messy though. >> Is it true that the Working Group can't comment during Last Call? That >> we have to raise issues before then? > > That would be a good reason to leave the WG by then :-). Not sure about it. > Big 10-4 on this. And that's I would do if someone we ended up in LC with all the issues still unresolved. >> If this is true, is Last Call still on schedule for October? Do we >> know when in October? > > I'd like to know this as well. With the ton of open issues, I just don't see > how to get there, unless we finally start pruning the stuff that's > orthogonal and doesn't enjoy any kind of consensus. > Agree. I'm thinking, though, of how long I have to put alternative draft text into the system. I have to kind of squeeze the effort around stuff I get paid for. > BR, Julian > Thx Shelley
Received on Thursday, 6 August 2009 17:46:38 UTC