- From: Joshue O Connor <joshue.oconnor@cfit.ie>
- Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2008 12:55:42 +0100
- To: stephane.deschamps@orange-ftgroup.com
- Cc: 'HTML WG' <public-html@w3.org>, 'W3C WAI-XTECH' <wai-xtech@w3.org>
Hi Stephane, stephane.deschamps@orange-ftgroup.com wrote: > Which leads to the conclusion that the headers/id constructs should be kept > in the spec as a complement to the scope method, as it has *some* uses that > cannot be done with scope. > > (as in: it's not just a problem of a specific UA or accessibility tool that > does not implement scope properly, it's also a broader problem that should > be kept in mind) +1. However, it is important to note that support for @scope is very very poor. While this is - strictly speaking - a User Agent issue the reality of how @scope is used and supported should be held firmly in mind by the editors as the HTML 5 specification progresses. I do hope that the level of UA support for @scope will improve. Cheers Josh
Received on Tuesday, 2 September 2008 11:56:31 UTC