- From: Robert J Burns <rob@robburns.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 14:15:14 -0500
- To: "Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)" <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
- Cc: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Hi Philip, On Oct 29, 2008, at 12:24 PM, Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd) wrote: > > > Robert J Burns wrote: > >> The p element DOES add punctuation in the same way that the q >> elements adds punctuation. The following HTML: >> <p>here is a paragraph.</p><p>And that paragraph is followed by >> another paragraph.</p> >> will be rendered >> here is a paragraph. >> And that paragraph is followed by another paragraph. >> With new lines inserted between the paragraphs. > > Is this presentation mandated by HTML, or simply > a de facto standard ? I don't think it is a MUST norm, but certainly it is a de facto standard. I also don't understand this conversation to be about making the wrapping of Q element in quotation marks as a MUST requirement either. Rather I think we should include a sample default UA stylesheet that provides some appropriate presentation for the Q element (likely language appropriate quotation marks using ::before and ::after). UAs would of course be permitted to use their own default UA stylesheet or to provide equivalent functionality to a default UA stylesheet using a mechanism entirely. We may, however, want to have a MUST requirement that the default presentation of a Q element provides some distinguishing presentation. >> The major difference is that a paragraph is almost universally >> presented with new lines between them, > > With respect, not. Paragraphs are, equally often, indented > (we are talking here about modern Western norms, rather > than a more general universe of discourse). Most printed > books (same Uni.) use indentation; most web documents use > blank lines. Computer-generated printed documents > probably use blank lines more often than indentation, but > this is by no means a universal or near-universal. I think you misunderstood what I was referring to as universal (and I'm afraid my example created that ambiguity). When I said a newline between paragraphs is nearly a universal I meant a single (at least one) new line. That is paragraphs do not run-on from one to the next without a new line between them (though not necessarily two new lines as my example depicted). > > >> whereas a quotation has many different possible presentations > > And paragraphs have at least two ! Paragraphs have many presentation options, yes. But my point was that unlike a quotation which may be presented wrapped in new lines or wrapped in quotations, paragraphs always (nearly universally) have a new line separating them (at least one). Take care, Rob
Received on Wednesday, 29 October 2008 19:15:57 UTC