Re: UA support for Content-Disposition header (filename parameter)

Lachlan Hunt wrote:
> ...
> It is not the job of the HTML5 specification to require that 
> implementers support other specifications that do not have a direct 
> impact upon the features in HTML5.  Please just file appropriate bug 
> reports with browsers vendors that do not support the features defined 
> in that RFC.
> ...

As a matter of fact, a bug report was raised against IE (something like 
2003), and the answer was that it's not a bug.

That's why I think it would be a good thing if HTML5 clarified that 
RFC2231 support is required.

BR, Julian

Received on Friday, 14 March 2008 14:55:37 UTC