W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > March 2008

Re: UA support for Content-Disposition header (filename parameter)

From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 22:54:53 -0700
Cc: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Message-Id: <2F13278D-AE3B-4E6C-9844-9449262874E2@apple.com>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>

On Mar 14, 2008, at 7:54 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:

> Lachlan Hunt wrote:
>> ...
>> It is not the job of the HTML5 specification to require that  
>> implementers support other specifications that do not have a direct  
>> impact upon the features in HTML5.  Please just file appropriate  
>> bug reports with browsers vendors that do not support the features  
>> defined in that RFC.
>> ...
> As a matter of fact, a bug report was raised against IE (something  
> like 2003), and the answer was that it's not a bug.
> That's why I think it would be a good thing if HTML5 clarified that  
> RFC2231 support is required.

Does the latest HTTP RFC require RFC2231? That sounds like the right  
place to start, if we are to consider this RFC mandatory for user  

Received on Sunday, 16 March 2008 05:55:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:44:27 UTC