- From: Charles Hinshaw <charles@everydayrevolution.com>
- Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 09:16:37 -0400
- To: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
I think that supplementing prose with a schema fragment with content model (or an example) might aid in understanding, but replacing it with any of them will only lead to confusion. I can think of ways in which a schema fragment or example might hurt though -- if content models and examples aren't used to clarify other points, they may lead a reader to believe that there is something unique or different about the description for head. The text below seems to be very clear. >> Zero or one meta element(s) with a charset attribute, >> followed by zero or one base element(s), >> followed, in any order, by one title element >> and zero or more other metadata elements such >> as link, meta, style, and script. > > Don't you think that having small schema fragment with content model > here will be more readable and easier to understand? >
Received on Friday, 5 October 2007 13:17:28 UTC