- From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 09:53:14 -0700
- To: public-html-wg-announce@w3.org
- Cc: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
I regret that I expect to be late, or maybe too late, for the call....I'll do my best to move fast. At 10:25 -0400 12/08/09, Sam Ruby wrote: >The HTML Working Group will have its usual weekly teleconference on >2009-08-13 for 60 minutes from 16:00Z to 17:00Z. > > http://timeanddate.com/s/1bc8 > >Tokyo 01:00+1, Amsterdam/Oslo 18:00, London/Dublin 17:00, New >Jersey/York 12 noon, Kansas City 11:00, Seattle/San Francisco 09:00. > >I (Sam Ruby) will chair this meeting. We are looking for a scribe. > >Dial-in and IRC details: > > Zakim teleconference bridge > +1.617.761.6200, +33.4.89.06.34.99, +44.117.370.6152 > code: HTML (4865) > > Supplementary IRC chat (logged) > #html-wg on irc.w3.org port 6665 or port 80 > >Agenda: > >1) remind everybody that there is a poll going on: > > http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/ > >2) review of open action items, based on target dates > > http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/agenda#act_by_iss > >3) review of pending review action items > > http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/agenda#pending%20review_action > >4) review of raised action items that have been identified as > candidates for closure at this time. > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Aug/0569.html > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Aug/0574.html > >Additions to the agenda are welcome. If you plan to attend the telcon >and wish to place an item on the agenda, please reply to this message >with your agenda request. > >Additional details on agenda items 2, 3, and 4 can be found below. > >=open= > >Last week we had a full teleconference (literally: people were being >turned away). These people's time is precious: for items that the >status is "we're continuing to work it, I'll report back in n-weeks" >I am going to continue to do like I did last week and preemptively >move the date back a week. This week that affects: > >Action-108/Larry Masinter/html-versioning >Action-103/Julian Reschke/doctype-legacy-compat >Action-86/Julian Reschke/urls-webarch > >Remaining items: > >Issue-35/Action-114 aria-processing >My understanding is that the ARIA TF has answers to the questions >that are blocking Ian's progress, but has a policy that prevents >them from sharing these answers. I've raised this issue with >Phillipe. I need somebody to tell me what I need to do to unblock >this or I will continue to escalate further. > >Issue-32/Action-128 table-summary >Cynthia has provided to me a draft for discussion purposes, we need >to work out the mechanics. More specifically, I botched a merge >last time and I need somebody to look over what I produced this time >and simply say "yes, that's what I intended". I've place my >intermediate results here: > > http://intertwingly.net/tmp/cynthia/pf-summary-3.html > >Issue-74/Action-133 canvas-accessibility >This item is not due this week, but I'm choosing to flag it at this >time as it as a target date of 2009-12-17 which would preclude us >for going to Last Call this year. I'd like to put out a call for >volunteers: if there is anybody out there with an interest and >ability to help pull this date in, I would like to ask that they >step forward. > >= pending review = > >Action-34 authoring guide >I suggest closing this item, and treat the status of the H:TML as >not ready for publication yet, per: > >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Aug/0012.html > >Action-106: test suite coordination >It is not clear what I need to review. Suggest closing. > >Action-115: TPAC participants signup >I take it that all that remains is for someone to send a note to >public-html? If so, I'll gladly do it and then close this action. > >Issue-4/Action-129 html-versioning >Larry has indicated that he believes that this action is complete >and recommends that it be closed. I concur. (Note: action 108 on >this same issue is still open). > >=raised= > >After a long gestation process, we hopefully are in our last >trimester before what will likely be our first last call. The >issues list -- the very subject of our the weekly call -- will be >that last hurdle. > >The goal isn't perfection, the goal is the best we can do. In the >process, we've identified a number of potential issues that over an >extended period of time absolutely nobody has thought important >enough to make a concrete proposal or even gather up some relevant >data. Maciej has identified a number of such issues, namely: > >issue-5: button-type-radio >http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/5 > >issue-6: videoaudio >http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/6 > >issue-9: video-synchronization >http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/9 > >issue-10: video-smil >http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/10 > >issue-11: default-encoding >http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/11 > >issue-12: test-case-file-names >http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/12 > >issue-16: offline-applications-sql >http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/16 > >issue-17: media-queries-tab-preprocessing >http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/17 > >issue-26: accessibility/usability of HTML5 and W3C default stylesheets >http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/26 > >issue-34: commonality >http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/34 > >issue-36: client-side-storage-sql >http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/36 > >issue-37: html-svg-mathml >http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/37 > >issue-38: style-attr-syntax >http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/38 > >issue-43: client-side image maps >http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/43 > >Additionally, the following issue either needs to be closed or an >action item needs to be created. > >issue-20: table-headers >http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/20 > >Closing this issue by opening a bugzilla item on the newly minted >testsuite component is fine with me. This suggestion may also apply >to issue-12. > >Items that are closed may be reopened at future dates if new >information and -- more importantly -- owners step forward to accept >on action items that have a reasonable promise of making progress on >these items. > >- Sam Ruby -- David Singer Multimedia Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Wednesday, 12 August 2009 16:55:46 UTC