- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 20:51:45 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13263
Summary: Issues that have no impact on conformance requirements
can consume undue time and energy
Product: HTML WG
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: working group Decision Policy
AssignedTo: dave.null@w3.org
ReportedBy: mjs@apple.com
QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
CC: mjs@apple.com, Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com,
rubys@intertwingly.net, mike@w3.org
At times, tracker issues arise that have no material impact on either authoring
or implementation conformance. At times these are changes that the W3C Process
would class as "minor" rather than "substantive".
The Process has much lower requirements for changes or issues that are not
substantive. Non-substantive changes need only diffs, not summary text, as
documentation when requesting transition. Non-substantive changes do not
require a return to Working Draft. And the W3C Process allows simple voting to
be used on non-substantive matters.
Treating Change Proposals that call for a non-substantive change the same as
any other a great deal of the group's and the chairs' time and energy. It also
discourages participation from people who do not feel as strongly, even though
such changes are often simply matters of taste, and do not have a material
effect on the specification.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 14 July 2011 20:51:50 UTC