- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 20:51:45 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13263 Summary: Issues that have no impact on conformance requirements can consume undue time and energy Product: HTML WG Version: unspecified Platform: PC OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: working group Decision Policy AssignedTo: dave.null@w3.org ReportedBy: mjs@apple.com QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org CC: mjs@apple.com, Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com, rubys@intertwingly.net, mike@w3.org At times, tracker issues arise that have no material impact on either authoring or implementation conformance. At times these are changes that the W3C Process would class as "minor" rather than "substantive". The Process has much lower requirements for changes or issues that are not substantive. Non-substantive changes need only diffs, not summary text, as documentation when requesting transition. Non-substantive changes do not require a return to Working Draft. And the W3C Process allows simple voting to be used on non-substantive matters. Treating Change Proposals that call for a non-substantive change the same as any other a great deal of the group's and the chairs' time and energy. It also discourages participation from people who do not feel as strongly, even though such changes are often simply matters of taste, and do not have a material effect on the specification. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 14 July 2011 20:51:50 UTC