- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 17:18:57 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13263 --- Comment #3 from Edward O'Connor <eoconnor@apple.com> 2011-07-15 17:18:56 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > Having a lightweight process leading to a preference poll in this > context would indeed amount to a popularity contest, which would both > increase drama and be inconsistent with selecting the proposal that > draws the least objections. In general I don't like preference polls, but it's precisely cases like ISSUE-150 where they would be most useful to *reduce* drama. Anne was right when he said "'Amicable Resolution' seems to more likely indicate 'Lack of Participation' than a resolution everyone can live with." I can confidently say that I would not have replied as I did to the chairs' decision on ISSUE-150 had that decision taken the form "80% of poll respondents prefer this CP to what's currently in the spec" and not "no one could be bothered to reply to the CfC, so please make this change." -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 15 July 2011 17:18:58 UTC