- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 17:57:41 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13263
Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jonas@sicking.cc
--- Comment #5 from Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> 2011-07-15 17:57:40 UTC ---
On a practical note, wouldn't we end up with license problems here? The
document used to generate the HTML5 specification uses a different license than
the W3C document license.
If the editor is forced to take changes to the document then either
A) Those changes must be available under the same license as the document used
to
generate the HTML5 specification.
B) The specification would have to be forked.
Would we be fine with requiring A from people supplying diffs? Despite the fact
that this license is not the W3C document license?
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 15 July 2011 17:57:47 UTC