W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > July 2011

[Bug 13263] Issues that have no impact on conformance requirements can consume undue time and energy

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 18:23:26 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1Qhn2s-0007NR-0r@jessica.w3.org>

--- Comment #7 from Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> 2011-07-15 18:23:25 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> On a practical note, wouldn't we end up with license problems here? The
> document used to generate the HTML5 specification uses a different license than
> the W3C document license.
> If the editor is forced to take changes to the document then either
> A) Those changes must be available under the same license as the document used
> to
>    generate the HTML5 specification.
> B) The specification would have to be forked.
> Would we be fine with requiring A from people supplying diffs? Despite the fact
> that this license is not the W3C document license?

I think this concern is unrelated to the topic at hand. This is not about
licensing issues with provided text, and such licensing issues can presumably
come up whether the text is "minor" or "substantive". This issue is
specifically about using a streamlined process for matters that the W3C Process
would consider "minor" changes.

Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 15 July 2011 18:23:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:01:55 UTC