- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 18:23:26 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13263 --- Comment #7 from Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> 2011-07-15 18:23:25 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > On a practical note, wouldn't we end up with license problems here? The > document used to generate the HTML5 specification uses a different license than > the W3C document license. > > If the editor is forced to take changes to the document then either > > A) Those changes must be available under the same license as the document used > to > generate the HTML5 specification. > B) The specification would have to be forked. > > Would we be fine with requiring A from people supplying diffs? Despite the fact > that this license is not the W3C document license? I think this concern is unrelated to the topic at hand. This is not about licensing issues with provided text, and such licensing issues can presumably come up whether the text is "minor" or "substantive". This issue is specifically about using a streamlined process for matters that the W3C Process would consider "minor" changes. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 15 July 2011 18:23:27 UTC