- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 01:31:43 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7510 Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cam@mcc.id.au --- Comment #5 from Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> 2009-09-22 01:31:43 --- Ian, perhaps you can consider http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Sep/0623.html as part of this. A note pointing out that text/html documents such as <!DOCTYPE html> <title></title> <svg><foo xmlns="http://example.org/"/></svg> are non-conforming due to the fact that the <foo> element is placed in the SVG namespace, resulting in a DOM subtree which is not a conforming SVG DOM subtree, would be good to clarify the matter. (Assuming you aren't going to change the text/html parsing algorithm to construct a DOM that would contain a conforming SVG DOM subtree, or that you don't add any pre-processing rules that would allow that subtree to be conforming, which would be the two obvious ways to make the above conforming, AFAICT.) Similarly for <!DOCTYPE html> <title></title> <svg><a:foo xmlns:a="http://example.org/"/></svg> due to the element {http://www.w3.org/2000/svg}aU00003Afoo also causing the SVG content not being a conforming SVG DOM subtree. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 22 September 2009 01:31:53 UTC