- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 09:00:39 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7510
Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #6 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2009-09-22 09:00:39 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> it is not about supporting namespaces [...] I have been told, specifically, by the
> creator of Validator.nu that, according to the HTML5 specification, the use of
> dc:foo in SVG is "not allowed".
dc:foo is only not allowed because of the lack of support for namespaces.
That's why I keep bringing up namespaces. Without namespaces, it's just an SVG
element, and the SVG spec doesn't define it, so it's not allowed.
> A note spelling out, more or less what you just wrote in this comment, should
> be sufficient: the HTML5 specification treats SVG a a foreign object: what is,
> or is not valid, within that object is defined elsewhere. There should be no
> errors or warnings of conformance from an HTML5 validator about contents within
> the SVG tags.
(In reply to comment #5)
>
> A note pointing out that text/html documents such as
>
> <!DOCTYPE html>
> <title></title>
> <svg><foo xmlns="http://example.org/"/></svg>
>
> are non-conforming due to the fact that the <foo> element is placed in the SVG
> namespace, resulting in a DOM subtree which is not a conforming SVG DOM
> subtree, would be good to clarify the matter.
Ok, I've added such a note.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 22 September 2009 09:00:50 UTC