- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 09:00:39 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7510 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #6 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2009-09-22 09:00:39 --- (In reply to comment #4) > it is not about supporting namespaces [...] I have been told, specifically, by the > creator of Validator.nu that, according to the HTML5 specification, the use of > dc:foo in SVG is "not allowed". dc:foo is only not allowed because of the lack of support for namespaces. That's why I keep bringing up namespaces. Without namespaces, it's just an SVG element, and the SVG spec doesn't define it, so it's not allowed. > A note spelling out, more or less what you just wrote in this comment, should > be sufficient: the HTML5 specification treats SVG a a foreign object: what is, > or is not valid, within that object is defined elsewhere. There should be no > errors or warnings of conformance from an HTML5 validator about contents within > the SVG tags. (In reply to comment #5) > > A note pointing out that text/html documents such as > > <!DOCTYPE html> > <title></title> > <svg><foo xmlns="http://example.org/"/></svg> > > are non-conforming due to the fact that the <foo> element is placed in the SVG > namespace, resulting in a DOM subtree which is not a conforming SVG DOM > subtree, would be good to clarify the matter. Ok, I've added such a note. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 22 September 2009 09:00:50 UTC