- From: Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 11:51:42 +0100
- To: Government Linked Data Working Group <public-gld-wg@w3.org>
I have updated the QB CR document in preparation for tomorrow's vote. o Removed the list of editorial changes in response to Sandro's suggestion. o Updated the static CR render to show min CR period as 4 weeks. o Added a diff. Still need to respond to commenters on the final disposition of their editorial comments. Richard, shall I go ahead and do that? Dave On 03/05/13 15:48, Dave Reynolds wrote: > Richard, all, > > I've progressed the preparation for moving Data Cube to CR. Details > below. Please check since we need the WG to be happy that everything in > place for this (and for ORG) in time for Thursday's vote. > > 1. I've recorded all the editorial changes made in response to Last Call > comments in the document [1]. > > 2. We ideally need to get back to each commenter to confirm how we have > dealt with their comments. We've done that, and have acknowledgements, > for all non-editorial comments but haven't yet done so for the editorial > changes. Richard are you OK for me to go ahead and do that? > > 3. I've created a static render of the proposed CR version of document > at [2]. Pubrules seems happy. As usual this will not look right in > Chrome thanks to security restrictions. This will be part of the > documentation package we will be voting on so needs checking with the > stuff below. > > I've set the same arbitrary CR minimum period as for ORG. We need to > agree on what the right answer is for both of them. > > 4. I've filled in the our CR transition page [3]. The key aspect is the > CR exit criteria. As discussed last Thursday I'm proposing that Data > Cube conformance be tested using the integrity constraints defined in > the spec. Unlike ORG, I'm not suggesting splitting the vocabulary into > feature groups. > > I'm suggesting that the normalization algorithm and integrity checks, > that were At Risk at Last Call remain At Risk through CR. This requires > a bit of care since we need most of the integrity checks to survive in > order to use them for CR exit! If the phrasing on the CR page isn't > clear let me know. If it is clear but you don't like it then definitely > let me know :) > > 5. Linked from the CR page I've started a page of implementations [4]. > I've just filled in those I know directly about and the ones mentioned > by people in the Last Call comments. I know there are a lot more around, > especially via DERI so help on filling our more examples please. > > Sandro, chairs, what else is needed? > > Cheers, > Dave > > [1] > https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/data-cube/index.html#change-history > > > [2] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/data-cube/static-cr.html > > [3] http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/Data_Cube_CR_transition > > [4] http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/Data_Cube_Implementations
Received on Wednesday, 8 May 2013 10:52:15 UTC