- From: Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 01 May 2013 16:35:33 +0100
- To: public-gld-wg@w3.org
On 01/05/13 16:47, Hadley Beeman wrote: > Hi all, > > Just reiterating this call… We had hoped to transition this doc (the Use > Case & Requirements doc for Data Cube) to full Working Group Note in > tomorrow's working group meeting. > > It just needs a final review from another working group member though. > Would someone please be willing to pick this up? It is also missing a section which I am down to write but struggling to find time to do so. There will not be a draft of this in time for tomorrow's meeting. Dave > Cheers, > > Hadley > > Hadley Beeman > Co-chair > W3C Government Linked Data Working Group > > Begin forwarded message: > >> *Resent-From: *public-gld-wg@w3.org <mailto:public-gld-wg@w3.org> >> *From: *Benedikt Kaempgen <kaempgen@fzi.de <mailto:kaempgen@fzi.de>> >> *Subject: **QB UC WG Note - Call for Reviewers* >> *Date: *25 April 2013 16:16:43 GMT+01:00 >> *To: *"public-gld-wg@w3.org <mailto:public-gld-wg@w3.org>" >> <public-gld-wg@w3.org <mailto:public-gld-wg@w3.org>> >> >> Hello everyone, >> >> As discussed in the call, I would like to ask for reviewers of the QB >> UC document [1]. >> >> The document's main purpose is to motivate use cases and requirements >> of the QB spec to an audience that considers QB in applications. As >> such, technical background in QB is helpful, but not necessary. >> >> Reviewing the clarity of the text could be reviewed by nearly everyone >> and would already be helpful. >> >> The deeper relationships between the QB specification and the QB UC >> document probably only can be reviewed by Dave or Richard. >> >> Any help with getting the document out as a WG Note would be appreciated. >> >> Best, >> >> Benedikt >> >> [1] >> <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/data-cube-ucr/data-cube-ucr-20130227/index.html> >> >
Received on Wednesday, 1 May 2013 15:36:06 UTC