W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-gld-wg@w3.org > March 2013

Re: AW: [QB] Disposition of issues

From: Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2013 17:35:50 +0000
Message-ID: <5138CFF6.3000907@gmail.com>
To: Benedikt Kaempgen <kaempgen@fzi.de>
CC: Government Linked Data Working Group <public-gld-wg@w3.org>
On 07/03/13 17:34, Dave Reynolds wrote:
> Thanks Benedit.

/Benedikt/  sorry for the typo.
Dave

>
> On:
>
>>  ISSUE-32   Relationship to ISO19156 - Observations & Measurements?
>>> Agree with putting the WG's result about this issue in the QB UC
>>> document. Can someone tell me how we should proceed here?
>
> The action remains with me to draft an initial version of this section
> for you to include at an appropriate point in the UC Note. I won't be
> able to do this for a little while but since the Note doesn't have to go
> through a Last Call process then we have a lot more time to deal with it.
>
> Dave
>
>
> On 07/03/13 17:19, Benedikt Kaempgen wrote:
>> Thanks for this overview, Dave,
>>
>> Here my comments to the issues (the comments to the spec come with
>> another mail):
>>
>>> ISSUE-29  Well-formedness
>> Have not tried the queries but had a look over their meaning and have
>> not found any errors.
>>
>>> ISSUE-30  Declaring relations between cubes (bad summary)
>> Postpone is fine for me.
>>
>>> ISSUE-31   Supporting aggregation for other than SKOS hierarchies
>> Although I have not tried this modelling myself, I do not find logical
>> errors and thus agree.
>>
>> However, I will have a comment to the hierarchical code list section
>> in the spec.
>>
>>> ISSUE-32   Relationship to ISO19156 - Observations & Measurements?
>> Agree with putting the WG's result about this issue in the QB UC
>> document. Can someone tell me how we should proceed here?
>>
>>> ISSUE-34 Clarify or drop qb:subslice ?
>> Would have preferred to keep it, but ok, agree.
>>
>>> ISSUE-33  Collections of observations and well-formedness of slices
>> I am not fully convinced that qb:ObservationGroup fully fulfills the
>> need of publishing a latest-value-slice but I think it is a useful
>> extension. Agree.
>>
>>> ISSUE-39 Allow skos:Collections as value of qb:codeList
>> Agree.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Benedikt
>>
>> ________________________________________
>> Von: Dave Reynolds [dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com]
>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 5. März 2013 16:03
>> An: Government Linked Data Working Group
>> Betreff: [QB] Disposition of issues
>>
>> I'd like us to clean up the ISSUEs and ACTIONs list for Data Cube.
>>
>> Here's a summary of where I believe we are on each of these.
>>
>> ISSUE-29  Well-formedness
>>
>> Discussed on list thread [1]. I believe we have a good set of criteria
>> and SPARQL queries to implement them. This is reflected in section 13 of
>> the current draft [2].   Recommend move to PENDING_REVIEW
>>
>> ISSUE-30  Declaring relations between cubes (bad summary)
>>
>> Discussed on list thread [3]. No disagreement with postponing. Note
>> added to spec about possibility of future extensions to support this
>> (section 10.4 [4]).         Recommend moving to POSTPONED.
>>
>> ISSUE-31   Supporting aggregation for other than SKOS hierarchies
>>
>> Discussed on list thread [5] and [10]. Compromise reached with the
>> introduction of qb:HierarchicalCodeList, qb:hierarchyRoot and
>> qb:parentChildProperty. Described in revised section 10.3 [6]. Recommend
>> moving this to PENDING_REVIEW and then to CLOSED once Richard and
>> Benedikt are happy with it.
>>
>> ISSUE-32   Relationship to ISO19156 - Observations & Measurements?
>>
>> Proposal to write information note on this as part of the Data Cube
>> requirements document. Should remain OPEN.
>>
>> ISSUE-33  Collections of observations and well-formedness of slices
>>
>> Discussed on list starting with thread [7]. Solution reached with
>> introduction of qb:ObservationGroup and qb:observationGroup. Described
>> at end of section 9 of the spec [8]. Recommend CLOSE.
>>
>> ISSUE-34 Clarify or drop qb:subslice ?
>>
>> Discussed on list starting thread [9]. While Benedikt has a reasonable
>> use case, Richard and I felt that given the limited time available to
>> resolve the problems it was better to remove this. It can always be
>> reintroduced in a future extension. Removal done. Recommend CLOSE.
>>
>> ISSUE-37 Align Data Cube with SDMX 2.1
>>
>> This remains OPEN for now. If Richard is able to deal with it in the
>> time available then that would be wonderful. Otherwise move to POSTPONED.
>>
>> ISSUE-39 Allow skos:Collections as value of qb:codeList
>>
>> Discussed on thread [10]. Handled by generalizing range of qb:codeList.
>> Recommend CLOSE.
>>
>> ACTION-30       pending review  Produce editor's draft of Data Cube spec
>> Richard Cyganiak        2012-02-01      Data Cube Vocabulary
>>
>> Obsolete, recommend CLOSE.
>>
>> ACTION-42       pending review  Update
>> http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/Data_Cube_Vocabulary    Richard Cyganiak
>> 2012-02-02      Data Cube Vocabulary
>>
>> Obsolete, recommend CLOSE.
>>
>> ACTION-56       open    Address QB feedback from Curran Richard Cyganiak
>> 2012-03-04      Data Cube Vocabulary
>>
>> This feedback was all dealt with some time ago. Recommend CLOSE.
>>
>> ACTION-63       open    Improve SDMX references Dave Reynolds
>> 2012-04-27      Data
>> Cube Vocabulary
>>
>> Done, request CLOSE.
>>
>> ACTION-64       open    Provide informative references to COG RDF schemes
>>
>> Done, request CLOSE.
>>
>> Dave
>>
>> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-wg/2013Feb/0106.html
>>
>> [2] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/data-cube/index.html#wf
>>
>> [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-wg/2013Feb/0085.html
>>
>> [4]
>> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/data-cube/index.html#schemes-aggregation
>>
>>
>> [5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-wg/2013Feb/0097.html
>>
>> [6]
>> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/data-cube/index.html#schemes-hierarchy-nonskos
>>
>>
>> [7] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-wg/2013Feb/0087.html
>> Some replies are not correctly linked to the thread in the mail archives.
>>
>> [8]
>> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/data-cube/index.html#slices
>>
>> [9] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-wg/2013Feb/0084.html
>> Some replies are not correctly linked to the thread in the mail archives.
>>
>> [10] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-wg/2013Mar/0008.html
>>
>>
>
Received on Thursday, 7 March 2013 17:36:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:32:38 UTC