W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-gld-wg@w3.org > March 2013

Re: AW: [QB] Disposition of issues

From: Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2013 17:34:34 +0000
Message-ID: <5138CFAA.1000908@gmail.com>
To: Benedikt Kaempgen <kaempgen@fzi.de>
CC: Government Linked Data Working Group <public-gld-wg@w3.org>
Thanks Benedit.

On:

>  ISSUE-32   Relationship to ISO19156 - Observations & Measurements?
>> Agree with putting the WG's result about this issue in the QB UC document. Can someone tell me how we should proceed here?

The action remains with me to draft an initial version of this section 
for you to include at an appropriate point in the UC Note. I won't be 
able to do this for a little while but since the Note doesn't have to go 
through a Last Call process then we have a lot more time to deal with it.

Dave


On 07/03/13 17:19, Benedikt Kaempgen wrote:
> Thanks for this overview, Dave,
>
> Here my comments to the issues (the comments to the spec come with another mail):
>
>> ISSUE-29  Well-formedness
> Have not tried the queries but had a look over their meaning and have not found any errors.
>
>> ISSUE-30  Declaring relations between cubes (bad summary)
> Postpone is fine for me.
>
>> ISSUE-31   Supporting aggregation for other than SKOS hierarchies
> Although I have not tried this modelling myself, I do not find logical errors and thus agree.
>
> However, I will have a comment to the hierarchical code list section in the spec.
>
>> ISSUE-32   Relationship to ISO19156 - Observations & Measurements?
> Agree with putting the WG's result about this issue in the QB UC document. Can someone tell me how we should proceed here?
>
>> ISSUE-34 Clarify or drop qb:subslice ?
> Would have preferred to keep it, but ok, agree.
>
>> ISSUE-33  Collections of observations and well-formedness of slices
> I am not fully convinced that qb:ObservationGroup fully fulfills the need of publishing a latest-value-slice but I think it is a useful extension. Agree.
>
>> ISSUE-39 Allow skos:Collections as value of qb:codeList
> Agree.
>
> Best,
>
> Benedikt
>
> ________________________________________
> Von: Dave Reynolds [dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com]
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 5. März 2013 16:03
> An: Government Linked Data Working Group
> Betreff: [QB] Disposition of issues
>
> I'd like us to clean up the ISSUEs and ACTIONs list for Data Cube.
>
> Here's a summary of where I believe we are on each of these.
>
> ISSUE-29  Well-formedness
>
> Discussed on list thread [1]. I believe we have a good set of criteria
> and SPARQL queries to implement them. This is reflected in section 13 of
> the current draft [2].   Recommend move to PENDING_REVIEW
>
> ISSUE-30  Declaring relations between cubes (bad summary)
>
> Discussed on list thread [3]. No disagreement with postponing. Note
> added to spec about possibility of future extensions to support this
> (section 10.4 [4]).         Recommend moving to POSTPONED.
>
> ISSUE-31   Supporting aggregation for other than SKOS hierarchies
>
> Discussed on list thread [5] and [10]. Compromise reached with the
> introduction of qb:HierarchicalCodeList, qb:hierarchyRoot and
> qb:parentChildProperty. Described in revised section 10.3 [6]. Recommend
> moving this to PENDING_REVIEW and then to CLOSED once Richard and
> Benedikt are happy with it.
>
> ISSUE-32   Relationship to ISO19156 - Observations & Measurements?
>
> Proposal to write information note on this as part of the Data Cube
> requirements document. Should remain OPEN.
>
> ISSUE-33  Collections of observations and well-formedness of slices
>
> Discussed on list starting with thread [7]. Solution reached with
> introduction of qb:ObservationGroup and qb:observationGroup. Described
> at end of section 9 of the spec [8]. Recommend CLOSE.
>
> ISSUE-34 Clarify or drop qb:subslice ?
>
> Discussed on list starting thread [9]. While Benedikt has a reasonable
> use case, Richard and I felt that given the limited time available to
> resolve the problems it was better to remove this. It can always be
> reintroduced in a future extension. Removal done. Recommend CLOSE.
>
> ISSUE-37 Align Data Cube with SDMX 2.1
>
> This remains OPEN for now. If Richard is able to deal with it in the
> time available then that would be wonderful. Otherwise move to POSTPONED.
>
> ISSUE-39 Allow skos:Collections as value of qb:codeList
>
> Discussed on thread [10]. Handled by generalizing range of qb:codeList.
> Recommend CLOSE.
>
> ACTION-30       pending review  Produce editor's draft of Data Cube spec
> Richard Cyganiak        2012-02-01      Data Cube Vocabulary
>
> Obsolete, recommend CLOSE.
>
> ACTION-42       pending review  Update
> http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/Data_Cube_Vocabulary    Richard Cyganiak
> 2012-02-02      Data Cube Vocabulary
>
> Obsolete, recommend CLOSE.
>
> ACTION-56       open    Address QB feedback from Curran Richard Cyganiak
> 2012-03-04      Data Cube Vocabulary
>
> This feedback was all dealt with some time ago. Recommend CLOSE.
>
> ACTION-63       open    Improve SDMX references Dave Reynolds   2012-04-27      Data
> Cube Vocabulary
>
> Done, request CLOSE.
>
> ACTION-64       open    Provide informative references to COG RDF schemes
>
> Done, request CLOSE.
>
> Dave
>
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-wg/2013Feb/0106.html
>
> [2] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/data-cube/index.html#wf
>
> [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-wg/2013Feb/0085.html
>
> [4]
> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/data-cube/index.html#schemes-aggregation
>
> [5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-wg/2013Feb/0097.html
>
> [6]
> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/data-cube/index.html#schemes-hierarchy-nonskos
>
> [7] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-wg/2013Feb/0087.html
> Some replies are not correctly linked to the thread in the mail archives.
>
> [8] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/data-cube/index.html#slices
>
> [9] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-wg/2013Feb/0084.html
> Some replies are not correctly linked to the thread in the mail archives.
>
> [10] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-wg/2013Mar/0008.html
>
>
Received on Thursday, 7 March 2013 17:35:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:32:38 UTC