Re: Minutes for W3C GLD WG telecon 24-Jan-2013

+1

We've briefly discussed in the WG the that there are a couple parts of the BP document should be omitted, Stability  & Versioning being two.  We can & should include language describing the issue for consideration however, not propose practices to address it IMO.

Thanks,
Bernadette


On Feb 14, 2013, at 11:15 AM, João Paulo Almeida <jpalmeida@inf.ufes.br> wrote:

> Dear Bernadette and others, 
> 
> I have reviewed the section on Stability of the BP document, and I believe it is not ready for prime time.
> 
> Honestly, I would recommend dropping this section or replacing it by a fairly generic piece of text that only raises stability as a concern (one or two paragraphs), and points to useful references (further reading). I'm not an expert on the topic, but I am willing to volunteer to produce this, if the group agrees this is the way to go.
> 
> There is a lot of work on long-term data preservation and the "properties" described in the text (section 6.3 are quite confusing and do not seem focused). This is not a simple issue, see, e.g. (a lot of initiatives are listed including standards on long-term data preservation):
> 
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_preservation
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OAIS 
> 
> Best regards,
> João Paulo
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> From: Boris Villazón-Terrazas <boris.villazon@terrazas.name>
> Date: Sunday, January 27, 2013 5:50 PM
> To: Bernadette Hyland <bhyland@3roundstones.com>
> Cc: Benedikt Kaempgen <kaempgen@fzi.de>, "public-gld-wg@w3.org" <public-gld-wg@w3.org>
> Subject: Re: Minutes for W3C GLD WG telecon 24-Jan-2013
> Resent-From: <public-gld-wg@w3.org>
> Resent-Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 19:50:54 +0000
> 
> Thanks Michael, Bernadette
> 
> Since Anne and Ron are not available, any volunteer to take care of section 13. Stability? Biplav? Joao Paulo?
> 
> Best,
> 
> Boris
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Bernadette Hyland <bhyland@3roundstones.com> wrote:
>> Hi Boris,
>> Thanks for circulating.  A couple WG members in yesterday's telecon agreed to do a thorough review and comment.  This included Biplav and Joao Paulo.  
>> 
>> Note: We should update assignments to Anne and Ron who are no longer involved in the WG AFAIK. 
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Bernadette
>> 
>> 
>> On Jan 25, 2013, at 4:08 AM, Boris Villazón-Terrazas <boris.villazon@terrazas.name> wrote:
>> 
>>> Dear all
>>> 
>>> Apologies for missing yesterday telecon's ... and for not sending my regrets in advance.
>>> 
>>> Regarding the BP document, I was working with the BP document including some comments from outside, e.g, Olaf, but I think it's time to try to finalize this first version. We can make the rest of improvements later on 
>>> 
>>> The current version is here [1]. 
>>> 
>>> Currently, there are some sections to review, so I would suggest the following section and reviewers: 
>>> - Background - Bernadette 
>>> - Linked Open Data Lifecycle -  Boris & Solve the current issue (ISSUE-15) 
>>> - Vocabulary Selection - Boris/Ghis 
>>> - URI Construction - John ERickson/Boris 
>>> - 6. URI Policy for Persistence - Bernadette/John Erickson 
>>> - 8. Specifying an appropiate License - Bernadette 
>>> - 9. Security and hosting -  Michael Pendleton 
>>> - 10. Publishers "Social Contract" -  Bernadette 
>>> - 11. Pragmatic Provenance -  John Erickson 
>>> - 12. Versioning -  John Erickson 
>>> - 13. Stability -  Anne Washington (GMU), Ron Reck 
>>> - 14. Source Data -  Biplav 
>>> 
>>> Reviewers would have one week to review their section, then we'll have another week to fix the document. I'll be the one to be doing the whole edition, and Bernadette can help me identifying possible minor issues. More help is appreciated.
>>> In summary after two weeks we should have a preliminary stable version of the document, so we can publish as a FPWD .... 
>>> Then, we can continue with the weekly updates and improvements. 
>>> 
>>> What do you think? 
>>> 
>>> Best
>>> 
>>> Boris
>>> 
>>> [1] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/bp/index.html
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Benedikt Kaempgen <kaempgen@fzi.de> wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>> 
>>>> See [1] for today's minutes.
>>>> 
>>>> Best,
>>>> 
>>>> Benedikt
>>>> 
>>>> [1] <http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/meeting/2013-01-24>
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 
>