- From: Boris Villazón-Terrazas <boris.villazon@terrazas.name>
- Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 12:36:58 +0100
- To: Bernadette Hyland <bhyland@3roundstones.com>
- Cc: Joăo Paulo Almeida <jpalmeida@inf.ufes.br>, Benedikt Kaempgen <kaempgen@fzi.de>, "public-gld-wg@w3.org" <public-gld-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAJ9EsG+xGu5LJRMmq27_=KfqtSKtFk5seaYZhOxfnO8Kh3MD4A@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Bernadette So, for FPWD purposes I'm going to remove those sections, ok? I'll do it tonight. Thanks Boris On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Bernadette Hyland <bhyland@3roundstones.com > wrote: > +1 > > We've briefly discussed in the WG the that there are a couple parts of the > BP document should be omitted, Stability & Versioning being two. We can & > should include language describing the issue for consideration however, not > propose practices to address it IMO. > > Thanks, > Bernadette > > > On Feb 14, 2013, at 11:15 AM, Joăo Paulo Almeida <jpalmeida@inf.ufes.br> > wrote: > > Dear Bernadette and others, > > I have reviewed the section on Stability of the BP document, and I believe > it is not ready for prime time. > > Honestly, I would recommend dropping this section or replacing it by a > fairly generic piece of text that only raises stability as a concern (one > or two paragraphs), and points to useful references (further reading). I'm > not an expert on the topic, but I am willing to volunteer to produce this, > if the group agrees this is the way to go. > > There is a lot of work on long-term data preservation and the "properties" > described in the text (section 6.3 are quite confusing and do not seem > focused). This is not a simple issue, see, e.g. (a lot of initiatives are > listed including standards on long-term data preservation): > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_preservation > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OAIS > > Best regards, > Joăo Paulo > > > > > > From: Boris Villazón-Terrazas <boris.villazon@terrazas.name> > Date: Sunday, January 27, 2013 5:50 PM > To: Bernadette Hyland <bhyland@3roundstones.com> > Cc: Benedikt Kaempgen <kaempgen@fzi.de>, "public-gld-wg@w3.org" < > public-gld-wg@w3.org> > Subject: Re: Minutes for W3C GLD WG telecon 24-Jan-2013 > Resent-From: <public-gld-wg@w3.org> > Resent-Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 19:50:54 +0000 > > Thanks Michael, Bernadette > > Since Anne and Ron are not available, any volunteer to take care of > section 13. Stability? Biplav? Joao Paulo? > > Best, > > Boris > > > > On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Bernadette Hyland < > bhyland@3roundstones.com> wrote: > >> Hi Boris, >> Thanks for circulating. A couple WG members in yesterday's telecon >> agreed to do a thorough review and comment. This included Biplav and Joao >> Paulo. >> >> Note: We should update assignments to Anne and Ron who are no longer >> involved in the WG AFAIK. >> >> Cheers, >> Bernadette >> >> >> On Jan 25, 2013, at 4:08 AM, Boris Villazón-Terrazas < >> boris.villazon@terrazas.name> wrote: >> >> Dear all >> >> Apologies for missing yesterday telecon's ... and for not sending my >> regrets in advance. >> >> Regarding the BP document, I was working with the BP document including >> some comments from outside, e.g, Olaf, but I think it's time to try to >> finalize this first version. We can make the rest of improvements later on >> >> The current version is here [1]. >> >> Currently, there are some sections to review, so I would suggest the >> following section and reviewers: >> - Background - Bernadette >> - Linked Open Data Lifecycle - Boris & Solve the current issue >> (ISSUE-15) >> - Vocabulary Selection - Boris/Ghis >> - URI Construction - John ERickson/Boris >> - 6. URI Policy for Persistence - Bernadette/John Erickson >> - 8. Specifying an appropiate License - Bernadette >> - 9. Security and hosting - Michael Pendleton >> - 10. Publishers "Social Contract" - Bernadette >> - 11. Pragmatic Provenance - John Erickson >> - 12. Versioning - John Erickson >> - 13. Stability - Anne Washington (GMU), Ron Reck >> - 14. Source Data - Biplav >> >> Reviewers would have one week to review their section, then we'll have >> another week to fix the document. I'll be the one to be doing the whole >> edition, and Bernadette can help me identifying possible minor issues. More >> help is appreciated. >> In summary after two weeks we should have a preliminary stable version of >> the document, so we can publish as a FPWD .... >> Then, we can continue with the weekly updates and improvements. >> >> What do you think? >> >> Best >> >> Boris >> >> [1] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/bp/index.html >> >> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Benedikt Kaempgen <kaempgen@fzi.de>wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> See [1] for today's minutes. >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Benedikt >>> >>> [1] <http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/meeting/2013-01-24> >>> >>> >>> >> >> > > >
Received on Wednesday, 20 February 2013 11:37:30 UTC