- From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 17:38:44 +0100
- To: public-gld-wg@w3.org
Based on the discussion in today's meeting [1] I'm going to mark this issue as closed with the resolution that the chosen name is.... Drum Roll Please... Registered Organization Vocabulary Preferred abbreviation: RegORG which suggests: requested short URI /TR/vocab-regorg, namespace /ns/regorg# preferred prefix ro: My sincere thanks for all the attention paid to this. Expect an updated draft spec in the coming days. Phil. [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/meeting/2012-10-18#Topic__3a__Core_Business_Vocabulary_renamed_to_Legal_Entity On 18/10/2012 14:48, Phil Archer wrote: > > > On 18/10/2012 14:39, Dave Reynolds wrote: > [..] > >> >> ARGH! I now see that you've raised this as an issue on ORG. Did you >> mean to do that? Surely this is an issue for the ontology formerly >> known as the Legal Entity vocabulary. > > It's not an issue for ORG as such and I'm as keen as you that this does > *not* hold up the LC transition - it shouldn't. I do, however, think it > helpful at this stage to clarify what the LE/RCE/WTF vocab is about and > why org:FormalOrganization isn't (quite) specific enough. > > > -- Phil Archer W3C eGovernment http://www.w3.org/egov/ http://philarcher.org +44 (0)7887 767755 @philarcher1
Received on Thursday, 18 October 2012 16:39:13 UTC